Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PG&E Corporation
How PG&E Corporation stacks up
PCG · against 45 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
73/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 46 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including PCG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -10.7% vs peer median 0.0%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.0% vs peer median 8.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.4% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PCG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PCG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 10.4% | 4.7% | 96% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 11.0% | 7.4% | 93% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | -10.7% | -4.6% | 10% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 45 reported | 110.4% | 45.4% | 98% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PCG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 91 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2.96T JPY (≈$20.1B) | 82 | 48 | |
| 3 | 27.0B EUR (≈$29.7B) | 76 | 63 | |
| 4 | 3.12T INR (≈$37.4B) | 73 | 62 | |
| 4 | 39.9B USD | 73 | 54 | |
| 6 | 59.2B EUR (≈$65.2B) | 69 | 47 | |
| 7 | 23.3B USD | 68 | 78 | |
| 7 | 2.41T INR (≈$29.0B) | 68 | 69 | |
| 9 | 26.0B USD | 57 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score