Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pitney Bowes Inc.
How Pitney Bowes Inc. stacks up
PBI · against 2,439 other Industrials companies
Profitability
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #111 of 2,440 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score257 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including PBI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 78% of peers. Return on assets: 6.2% vs peer median 3.1%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 89% of peers. Operating margin: 20.4% vs peer median 7.7%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 94% of peers. Return on invested capital: 31.5% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PBI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PBI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 2,323 reported | 31.5% | 7.1% | 94% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 2,434 reported | 20.4% | 7.7% | 89% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 2,336 reported | 6.2% | 3.1% | 78% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 2,300 reported | Not reported | 8.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 2,460 reported | 54.1% | 25.8% | 92% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PBI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.9B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 13.8B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 100 | 89 | |
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 51M MYR (≈$11M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 111 | 15.5B USD | 95 | 56 | |
| 111 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 73 | |
| 111 | 91.3B USD | 95 | 45 | |
| 111 | 23.6B SEK (≈$2.4B) | 95 | 61 | |
| 111 | 2.1B USD | 95 | 59 | |
| 111 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 69 | |
| 111 | 1.5B NZD (≈$906M) | 95 | 73 | |
| 111 | 58M USD | 95 | 95 | |
| 136 | 120.4B JPY (≈$819M) | 94 | 90 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score