Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Paysign, Inc.
How Paysign, Inc. stacks up
PAYS · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #710 of 1,667 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PAYS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.6% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAYS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAYS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 1.8% | 2.3% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 3.3% | 4.3% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 7.9% | 2.7% | 82% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 7.0% | 33.4% | 8% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAYS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 710 | 317M EUR (≈$349M) | 57 | 38 | |
| 710 | 3.9B USD | 57 | 52 | |
| 710 | 631M USD | 57 | 42 | |
| 710 | 702M USD | 57 | 55 | |
| 710 | 854M USD | 57 | 74 | |
| 726 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 56 | 50 | |
| 726 | 30.3B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 56 | 56 | |
| 726 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 56 | 61 | |
| 726 | 4.6B CNY (≈$647M) | 56 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score