Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PAYC · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,544 of 1,698 · scores higher than 9% of peers · safety percentile 9
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including PAYC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PAYC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 1.72× | 0.26× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.79 | 0.84 | 53% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.07× | 1.83× | 15% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,540 | 3.0B JPY (≈$21M) | 9 | 12 | |
| 1,541 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.6B USD |
| 9 |
| 43 |
| 1,542 | 205.2B TWD (≈$6.4B) | 9 | 42 |
| 1,543 | 763M USD | 9 | 65 |
| 1,544 | 11.9B USD | 9 | 55 |
| 1,545 | 375M EUR (≈$412M) | 9 | 41 |
| 1,546 | 6.3B USD | 9 | 55 |
| 1,547 | 525.6B KRW (≈$378M) | 9 | 35 |
| 1,548 | 848M USD | 9 | 48 |