Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Patrick Industries, Inc.
How Patrick Industries, Inc. stacks up
PATK · against 364 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #166 of 365 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PATK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 11.0% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PATK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PATK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 364 reported | 5.2% | 5.4% | 48% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 373 reported | 10.3% | 9.5% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | 4.7% | 6.2% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 366 reported | 43.3% | 45.8% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PATK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 8.6B BRL (≈$1.5B) | 97 | 81 | |
| 161 | 2.2B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 161 | 1.7B GBP (≈$2.3B) | 58 | 55 | |
| 166 | 13.1B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 57 | 42 | |
| 166 | 4.4B USD | 57 | 53 | |
| 166 | 2.6B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 166 | 4.2B USD | 57 | 31 | |
| 166 | 2.0B USD | 57 | 27 | |
| 166 | 1.8B USD | 57 | 46 | |
| 172 | 32.4B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 56 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score