Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pampa Energía S.A.
How Pampa Energía S.A. stacks up
PAM · against 540 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #107 of 541 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score67 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including PAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 92% of peers. EBITDA yield: 19.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 537 reported | 16.1% | 4.4% | 97% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 546 reported | 19.0% | 7.9% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | -12.4% | 4.3% | 7% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 537 reported | 111.1% | 42.0% | 90% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 107 | 426.9B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 79 | 67 | |
| 107 | 79.5B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 79 | 64 | |
| 107 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 79 | 31 | |
| 107 | 82.2B ZAR (≈$4.5B) | 79 | 59 | |
| 107 | 3.7B USD | 79 | 67 | |
| 107 | 30.3B BRL (≈$5.4B) | 79 | 66 | |
| 116 | 57.4B HKD (≈$7.3B) | 78 | 60 | |
| 116 | 25.7B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 78 | 48 | |
| 116 | 502.8B JPY (≈$3.4B) | 78 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score