Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Phibro Animal Health Corporation
How Phibro Animal Health Corporation stacks up
PAHC · against 1,335 other Healthcare companies
Profitability
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #289 of 1,336 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score134 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including PAHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 66% of peers. Operating margin: 12.8% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 80% of peers. Return on assets: 6.6% vs peer median 1.7%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 81% of peers. Return on invested capital: 16.3% vs peer median 4.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,226 reported | 16.3% | 4.7% | 81% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,251 reported | 12.8% | 7.1% | 66% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,315 reported | 6.6% | 1.7% | 80% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,252 reported | 29.7% | 3.2% | 94% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,394 reported | 33.3% | 45.9% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 321.5B INR (≈$3.9B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 174.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 97.3B INR (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 5 | 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 289 | 162.93T ARS (≈$162.9B) | 78 | 63 | |
| 289 | 14.8B BRL (≈$2.7B) | 78 | 63 | |
| 289 | 45.9B USD | 78 | 61 | |
| 289 | 21.1B ZAR (≈$1.2B) | 78 | 60 | |
| 289 | 1.5B USD | 78 | 65 | |
| 289 | 22.6B USD | 78 | 59 | |
| 302 | 178.5B KRW (≈$129M) | 77 | 76 | |
| 302 | 576.5B JPY (≈$3.9B) | 77 | 67 | |
| 302 | 44.2B JPY (≈$301M) | 77 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score