Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PAG · against 151 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #66 of 152 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PAG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | PAG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 6.7% | 4.7% | 72% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 6.0% | 8.4% | 27% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 84 reported | 4.2% | 5.8% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 41.7% | 30.8% | 61% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 5 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 66 | 52.0B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 66 | 3.33T JPY (≈$22.7B) | 51 | 47 | |
| 66 | 10.6B CAD (≈$7.7B) | 51 | 38 | |
| 66 | 15.4B USD | 51 | 74 | |
| 66 | 13.9B USD | 51 | 44 | |
| 71 | 16.7B USD | 50 | 54 | |
| 71 | 8.7B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 73 | 9.8B USD | 49 | 57 | |
| 73 | 18.6B USD | 49 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score