Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EAT · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #770 of 1,553 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including EAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | EAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.1% | 4.4% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 8.2% | 8.8% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 6.4% | 6.1% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 5.1% | 57.2% | 6% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 770 | 2.9B USD | 50 | 28 | |
| 770 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.7B USD |
| 50 |
| 43 |
| 770 | 16.7B USD | 50 | 54 |
| 770 | 617M GBP (≈$803M) | 50 | 67 |
| 770 | 8.7B USD | 50 | 59 |
| 770 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 50 | 69 |
| 770 | 474M USD | 50 | 30 |
| 770 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 |
| 785 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 49 | 61 |