Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PAG · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #148 of 356 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PAG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | PAG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 6.7% | 4.3% | 76% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 6.0% | 8.4% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 4.2% | 5.3% | 40% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 41.7% | 35.8% | 53% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 148 | 3.5B USD | 51 | 34 | |
| 148 | 15.4B USD | 51 | 74 | |
| 148 | 459M USD | 51 | 38 | |
| 148 | 593M USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 148 | 13.9B USD | 51 | 44 | |
| 148 | 5.2B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 155 | 2.9B USD | 50 | 28 | |
| 155 | 2.7B USD | 50 | 43 | |
| 155 | 16.7B USD | 50 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score