Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PACS · against 197 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #124 of 198 · scores higher than 38% of peers · safety percentile 37
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including PACS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PACS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 192 reported | 3.05× | 0.29× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 200 reported | -0.08 | 0.58 | 94% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 190 reported | 0.91× | 2.70× | 4% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 9.0B USD | 98 | 51 | |
| 5 | 4.6B USD | 98 | 29 | |
| 120 | 47.8B HKD (≈$6.1B) | 40 | 58 | |
| 121 | 4.3B USD | 40 | 54 | |
| 122 | 4.4B USD | 39 | 66 | |
| 123 | 4.1B USD | 38 | 39 | |
| 124 | 7.4B USD | 37 | 67 | |
| 125 | 12.6B USD | 36 | 55 | |
| 126 | 4.6B USD | 36 | 65 | |
| 127 | 11.6B USD | 36 | 56 | |
| 128 | 4.0B USD | 35 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score