Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ranpak Holdings Corp.
How Ranpak Holdings Corp. stacks up
PACK · against 412 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
31/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #265 of 413 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including PACK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -14.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PACK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PACK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 396 reported | -14.8% | 3.1% | 10% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 422 reported | 10.4% | 8.9% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 136 reported | 2.8% | 7.0% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 398 reported | 203.5% | 73.2% | 90% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PACK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 261 | 69.4B JPY (≈$472M) | 32 | 42 | |
| 261 | 386M CAD (≈$282M) | 32 | 32 | |
| 261 | 271M USD | 32 | 62 | |
| 265 | 2.9B CNY (≈$410M) | 31 | 49 | |
| 265 | 256M USD | 31 | 29 | |
| 267 | 3.1B CNY (≈$433M) | 30 | 37 | |
| 267 | 3.2B CNY (≈$448M) | 30 | 63 | |
| 267 | 3.3B CNY (≈$455M) | 30 | 37 | |
| 267 | 62.2B JPY (≈$423M) | 30 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score