Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ranpak Holdings Corp.
How Ranpak Holdings Corp. stacks up
PACK · against 422 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #365 of 423 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score68 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including PACK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 93% of peers. Return on assets: -3.5% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 90% of peers. Operating margin: -3.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 85% of peers. Return on invested capital: -1.2% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PACK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PACK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 396 reported | -1.2% | 4.0% | 22% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 421 reported | -3.1% | 4.1% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 403 reported | -3.5% | 2.0% | 8% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 394 reported | -7.2% | 4.1% | 18% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 424 reported | 33.6% | 26.2% | 62% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PACK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 2 | 23.9B JPY (≈$162M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 2 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 624M SGD (≈$474M) | 97 | 82 | |
| 357 | 5.0B THB (≈$141M) | 11 | 27 | |
| 365 | 2.9B CNY (≈$405M) | 10 | 50 | |
| 365 | 3.4B CNY (≈$475M) | 10 | 19 | |
| 365 | 1.8B CNY (≈$254M) | 10 | 36 | |
| 365 | 256M USD | 10 | 29 | |
| 369 | 12.5B TWD (≈$386M) | 9 | 27 | |
| 369 | 3.3B CNY (≈$457M) | 9 | 27 | |
| 369 | 396M USD | 9 | 11 | |
| 369 | 193M USD | 9 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score