Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fossil Group, Inc.
How Fossil Group, Inc. stacks up
FOSL · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,452 of 1,604 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score153 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including FOSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -10.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on invested capital: -2.1% vs peer median 7.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 85% of peers. Operating margin: -0.6% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FOSL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FOSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | -2.1% | 7.3% | 13% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | -0.6% | 6.4% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | -10.6% | 3.3% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | -66.5% | 7.7% | 3% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 56.7% | 30.2% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FOSL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1,452 | 78.2B JPY (≈$532M) | 9 | 27 | |
| 1,452 | 910M USD | 9 | 36 | |
| 1,452 | 24M AUD (≈$16M) | 9 | 19 | |
| 1,452 | 14.5B USD | 9 | 29 | |
| 1,452 | 396M USD | 9 | 11 | |
| 1,452 | 193M USD | 9 | 34 | |
| 1,452 | 1.0B GBP (≈$1.3B) | 9 | 21 | |
| 1,452 | 59M USD | 9 | 36 | |
| 1,452 | 5.1B TRY (≈$154M) | 9 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score