Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Oxford Industries, Inc.
How Oxford Industries, Inc. stacks up
OXM · against 562 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #225 of 563 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score42 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including OXM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 13.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.3% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OXM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OXM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 552 reported | -1.8% | 3.1% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 573 reported | 9.2% | 8.2% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 150 reported | 12.3% | 7.2% | 68% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 554 reported | 133.6% | 65.2% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OXM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 225 | 4.6B CNY (≈$642M) | 59 | 82 | |
| 225 | 4.5B CNY (≈$632M) | 59 | 70 | |
| 225 | 707M USD | 59 | 74 | |
| 225 | 1.1B AUD (≈$741M) | 59 | 56 | |
| 225 | 423M USD | 59 | 33 | |
| 230 | 3.1B CNY (≈$434M) | 57 | 59 | |
| 230 | 47.9B JPY (≈$326M) | 57 | 47 | |
| 230 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 57 | 55 | |
| 230 | 74.4B JPY (≈$506M) | 57 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score