Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Blue Owl Capital Inc.
How Blue Owl Capital Inc. stacks up
OWL · against 131 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
26/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #93 of 132 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including OWL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 85% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.9% vs peer median 5.7%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 8.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.3% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OWL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OWL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | 1.2% | 4.8% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | 8.1% | 6.9% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 8.2% | 5.6% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 28.3% | 63.8% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OWL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 89 | 188.7B USD | 28 | 45 | |
| 89 | 2.7B USD | 28 | 58 | |
| 92 | 109.3B USD | 27 | 53 | |
| 93 | 709M USD | 26 | 32 | |
| 93 | 16.2B USD | 26 | 37 | |
| 95 | 90.7B USD | 25 | 33 | |
| 95 | 88.7B USD | 25 | 39 | |
| 97 | 345M USD | 24 | 21 | |
| 97 | 87.2B USD | 24 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score