Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ovintiv Inc.
How Ovintiv Inc. stacks up
OVV · against 54 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #25 of 55 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including OVV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -6.2% vs peer median -1.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 79% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 44.3% vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OVV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OVV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 55 reported | 6.0% | 2.6% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 50 reported | 44.3% | 2.4% | 71% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 55 reported | -6.2% | -3.2% | 39% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OVV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 4 | 20.1B USD | 91 | 65 | |
| 20 | 18.1B USD | 75 | 53 | |
| 22 | 54.3B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 68 | 52 | |
| 23 | 9.9B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 23 | 30.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 25 | 18.4B USD | 60 | 51 | |
| 26 | 2.51T INR (≈$30.2B) | 57 | 76 | |
| 27 | 1.78T JPY (≈$12.1B) | 55 | 58 | |
| 28 | 87.1B CNY (≈$12.2B) | 54 | 66 | |
| 29 | 19.2B CAD (≈$14.0B) | 53 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score