Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Oracle Corporation
How Oracle Corporation stacks up
ORCL · against 19 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
62/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 20 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ORCL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -7.5% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.9% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ORCL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ORCL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 19 reported | 5.1% | 2.3% | 100% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | 6.6% | 3.3% | 95% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | -7.5% | 1.9% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 17 reported | 16.2% | 6.9% | 88% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ORCL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 994.08T KRW (≈$715.7B) | 95 | 81 | |
| 2 | 235.6B USD | 65 | 52 | |
| 3 | 259.7B USD | 63 | 63 | |
| 4 | 382.5B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 5 | 265.8B USD | 54 | 68 | |
| 6 | 406.0B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 7 | 207.6B USD | 46 | 61 | |
| 8 | 303.1B USD | 43 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score