Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Option Care Health, Inc.
How Option Care Health, Inc. stacks up
OPCH · against 218 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #124 of 219 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including OPCH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.3% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.3% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OPCH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OPCH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 218 reported | 5.9% | 9.1% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 139 reported | 3.3% | 9.8% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 210 reported | 11.3% | 9.0% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OPCH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 2.8B USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 5 | 19.7B HKD (≈$2.5B) | 98 | 84 | |
| 121 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 52 | 48 | |
| 121 | 5.24T KRW (≈$3.8B) | 52 | 60 | |
| 121 | 548.2B INR (≈$6.6B) | 52 | 68 | |
| 124 | 74.2B SEK (≈$7.4B) | 51 | 55 | |
| 124 | 4.8B USD | 51 | 52 | |
| 124 | 3.9B USD | 51 | 58 | |
| 127 | 5.8B USD | 50 | 68 | |
| 127 | 3.0B USD | 50 | 39 | |
| 129 | 6.6B USD | 49 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score