Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OOMA · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,307 of 1,698 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including OOMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OOMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.62× | 0.26× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.23 | 0.84 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.95× | 1.83× | 10% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,303 | 440M GBP (≈$572M) | 23 | 12 | |
| 1,304 | 3.2B USD | 23 | 54 | |
| 1,305 | 181.7B EUR (≈$199.8B) | 23 | 56 | |
| 1,306 | 721M EUR (≈$793M) | 23 | 50 | |
| 1,307 | 518M USD | 23 | 51 | |
| 1,308 | 20.4B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 23 | 11 | |
| 1,309 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 23 | 54 | |
| 1,310 | 11.7B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 23 | 40 | |
| 1,311 | 24.6B EUR (≈$27.0B) | 23 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score