Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OOMA · against 615 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #494 of 616 · scores higher than 20% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)52 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including OOMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OOMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 585 reported | 0.62× | 0.21× | 26% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 598 reported | 1.23 | 0.65 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 615 reported | 0.95× | 1.90× | 10% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 4 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 99 | 52 | |
| 490 | 4.9B CNY (≈$685M) | 24 | 20 | |
| 491 | 3.3B CNY (≈$457M) | 24 | 19 | |
| 492 | 440M GBP (≈$572M) | 23 | 12 | |
| 493 | 721M EUR (≈$793M) | 23 | 50 | |
| 494 | 518M USD | 23 | 51 | |
| 495 | 5.2B HKD (≈$661M) | 22 | 60 | |
| 496 | 27.3B TWD (≈$845M) | 22 | 19 | |
| 497 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 22 | 61 | |
| 498 | 18.3B TWD (≈$569M) | 21 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score