Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ONTO · against 245 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 246 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including ONTO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ONTO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 237 reported | 0.77× | 0.33× | 22% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 234 reported | 1.58 | 1.01 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 245 reported | 9.73× | 1.69× | 96% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 3 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 5 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 22 | 183.7B TWD (≈$5.7B) | 90 | 50 | |
| 23 | 5.2B USD | 86 | 61 | |
| 24 | 5.4B USD | 86 | 86 | |
| 25 | 76.2B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 86 | 77 | |
| 26 | 9.9B USD | 86 | 56 | |
| 27 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 86 | 64 | |
| 28 | 197.3B TWD (≈$6.1B) | 85 | 78 | |
| 29 | 1.27T JPY (≈$8.6B) | 85 | 69 | |
| 30 | 1.59T INR (≈$19.0B) | 84 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score