Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CAMT · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #231 of 1,698 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CAMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CAMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.71× | 0.26× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.59 | 0.84 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 8.35× | 1.83× | 96% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 227 | 1.5B CNY (≈$209M) | 87 | 31 | |
| 228 | 36.6B JPY (≈$249M) | 87 | 60 | |
| 229 | 3.8B CNY (≈$527M) | 87 | 36 | |
| 230 | 5.3B CNY (≈$739M) | 87 | 49 | |
| 231 | 5.2B USD | 86 | 61 | |
| 232 | 5.4B USD | 86 | 86 | |
| 233 | 1.7B USD | 86 | 78 | |
| 234 | 219M USD | 86 | 49 | |
| 235 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 86 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score