Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to On Holding AG
How On Holding AG stacks up
ONON · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #40 of 356 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ONON · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -18.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: 30.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 35.1% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ONON, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ONON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 30.0% | 5.9% | 90% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -18.1% | 6.2% | 27% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 35.1% | 4.1% | 95% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ONON| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 35 | 5.7B USD | 92 | 77 | |
| 35 | 7.5B USD | 92 | 25 | |
| 40 | 576M USD | 91 | 25 | |
| 40 | 8.0B USD | 91 | 26 | |
| 40 | 12.2B USD | 91 | 63 | |
| 40 | 283M USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 40 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 55 | |
| 45 | 5.9B USD | 90 | 75 | |
| 45 | 1.2B USD | 90 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score