Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ON · against 133 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #81 of 134 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ON · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 127 reported | 0.65× | 0.34× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 130 reported | 2.05 | 1.16 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 132 reported | 3.46× | 1.64× | 88% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 77 | 19.4B USD | 30 | 63 | |
| 78 | 133.6B CNY (≈$18.7B) | 30 | 50 | |
| 79 | 26.1B EUR (≈$28.7B) | 30 | 56 | |
| 80 | 21.1B USD | 30 | 70 | |
| 81 | 28.3B USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 82 | 36.7B USD | 28 | 36 | |
| 83 | 4.52T JPY (≈$30.8B) | 28 | 52 | |
| 84 | 32.8B USD | 28 | 66 | |
| 85 | 491.0B TWD (≈$15.2B) | 28 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score