Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OLMA · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #435 of 1,373 · scores higher than 68% of peers · safety percentile 68
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including OLMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OLMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.01× | 0.24× | 90% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.99 | 0.53 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 8.86× | 2.62× | 85% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 431 | 13.9B EUR (≈$15.3B) | 69 | 78 | |
| 432 | 5.9B HKD (≈$760M) |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 59 |
| 433 | 598M USD | 69 | 49 |
| 434 | 113M USD | 68 | 23 |
| 435 | 643M USD | 68 | 31 |
| 436 | 2.1B CNY (≈$293M) | 68 | 63 |
| 437 | 921.9B INR (≈$11.1B) | 68 | 82 |
| 438 | 232.9B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 68 | 20 |
| 439 | 1.7B USD | 68 | 46 |