Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OIA · against 100 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #19 of 101 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including OIA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OIA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 82 reported | 0.43× | 0.54× | 58% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 95 reported | 0.80 | 0.59 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 98 reported | 9.75× | 2.25× | 82% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 15 | 519M AUD (≈$342M) | 89 | ||
| 16 | 11.7B THB (≈$328M) | 88 | 53 | |
| 17 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 87 | 77 | |
| 18 | 584M AUD (≈$385M) | 87 | 61 | |
| 19 | 275M USD | 86 | ||
| 20 | 352M USD | 86 | 62 | |
| 21 | 498M USD | 85 | 90 | |
| 22 | 384M USD | 85 | ||
| 23 | 353M USD | 84 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score