Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Once Upon A Farm, PBC
How Once Upon A Farm, PBC stacks up
OFRM · against 264 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #240 of 265 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including OFRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -5.4% vs peer median 8.7%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -9.1% vs peer median 6.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.4% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OFRM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OFRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 255 reported | -2.4% | 4.5% | 17% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 270 reported | -5.4% | 9.4% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | -9.1% | 5.3% | 13% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 257 reported | 38.9% | 67.8% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OFRM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$218M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$223M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 240 | 597M USD | 5 | 22 | |
| 240 | 3.1B NOK (≈$298M) | 5 | 12 | |
| 240 | 11.0B TRY (≈$330M) | 5 | 25 | |
| 240 | 436M USD | 5 | 24 | |
| 240 | 400M USD | 5 | 34 | |
| 240 | 253M USD | 5 | 18 | |
| 240 | 272M USD | 5 | 47 | |
| 247 | 2.6B CNY (≈$370M) | 4 | 38 | |
| 247 | 2.3B CNY (≈$317M) | 4 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score