Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OCTV · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #982 of 1,698 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including OCTV · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OCTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.14× | 0.26× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | Not reported | 0.84 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.03× | 1.83× | 13% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 978 | 3.7B SEK (≈$365M) | 42 | 56 | |
| 979 | 5.8B CNY (≈$815M) | 42 | 30 | |
| 980 | 1.1B AUD (≈$701M) | 42 | 56 | |
| 981 | 1.5B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 982 | 5.7B USD | 42 | 60 | |
| 983 | 7.5B TWD (≈$232M) | 42 | 38 | |
| 984 | 10.5B NOK (≈$995M) | 42 | 73 | |
| 985 | 5.9B CNY (≈$828M) | 42 | 15 | |
| 986 | 90.9B TWD (≈$2.8B) | 42 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score