Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OCTV · against 318 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #179 of 319 · scores higher than 44% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)37 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including OCTV · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OCTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 308 reported | 0.14× | 0.30× | 64% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 303 reported | Not reported | 1.02 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 316 reported | 1.03× | 1.83× | 10% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 175 | 26.6B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 44 | 67 | |
| 176 | 66.7B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 44 | 66 | |
| 177 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 43 | 83 | |
| 178 | 10.5B AUD (≈$7.0B) | 43 | 65 | |
| 179 | 5.7B USD | 42 | 60 | |
| 180 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 181 | 9.5B USD | 41 | 56 | |
| 182 | 5.5B USD | 40 | 43 | |
| 183 | 229.5B TWD (≈$7.1B) | 40 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score