Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
How Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation stacks up
OCSL · against 83 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #59 of 84 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including OCSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OCSL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OCSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 135 reported | 3.9% | 8.3% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 59 reported | Not reported | 8.3% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 9.9% | 11.7% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | 128.7% | 107.2% | 70% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OCSL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 5 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 66 | |
| 55 | 36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 49 | 29 | |
| 55 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 57 | 1.7B USD | 48 | ||
| 58 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 46 | 48 | |
| 59 | 1.1B USD | 44 | 37 | |
| 60 | 1.7B USD | 42 | 49 | |
| 61 | 530M EUR (≈$583M) | 41 | 43 | |
| 61 | 674M USD | 41 | 53 | |
| 63 | 6.5B MYR (≈$1.4B) | 40 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score