Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OBDC · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #288 of 399 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including OBDC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OBDC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 1.12× | 0.57× | 36% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.68 | 0.67 | 49% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 0.18× | 2.04× | 4% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 284 | 8.6B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 29 | 15 | |
| 285 | 601M USD | 29 | 72 | |
| 286 | 81.4B USD | 28 | 54 | |
| 287 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 28 | 29 | |
| 288 | 5.2B USD | 28 | 45 | |
| 289 | 3.2B EUR (≈$3.5B) | 28 | 10 | |
| 290 | 3.1B USD | 27 | 63 | |
| 291 | 22.8B SEK (≈$2.3B) | 27 | 51 | |
| 292 | 202M USD | 27 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score