Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Newell Brands Inc.
How Newell Brands Inc. stacks up
NWL · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #460 of 799 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including NWL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -9.4% vs peer median 4.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.5% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NWL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NWL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -9.4% | 4.5% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 11.5% | 8.9% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 4.9% | 6.3% | 40% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 102.3% | 54.4% | 78% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NWL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 460 | 43.3B USD | 42 | 63 | |
| 460 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 42 | 42 | |
| 460 | 33.7B USD | 42 | 51 | |
| 460 | 1.6B USD | 42 | 43 | |
| 460 | 2.4B USD | 42 | 25 | |
| 468 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 41 | 57 | |
| 468 | 3.9B CNY (≈$547M) | 41 | 64 | |
| 468 | 12.5B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 41 | 56 | |
| 468 | 11.5B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 41 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score