Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NWE · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #164 of 360 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 55
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including NWE · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NWE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 1.24× | 1.21× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.32 | 0.40 | 60% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.83× | 1.05× | 33% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 160 | 4.6B EUR (≈$5.0B) | 56 | 43 | |
| 161 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 47.0B CNY (≈$6.6B) |
| 55 |
| 48 |
| 162 | 4.4B CNY (≈$618M) | 55 | 36 |
| 163 | 69.8B CNY (≈$9.8B) | 55 | 68 |
| 164 | 4.9B USD | 55 | 41 |
| 165 | 1.9B CNY (≈$261M) | 54 | 25 |
| 166 | 42.3B CNY (≈$5.9B) | 54 | 48 |
| 167 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 54 | 51 |
| 168 | 8.4B USD | 53 | 43 |