Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NVS · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #944 of 1,373 · scores higher than 31% of peers · safety percentile 31
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including NVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 1.17× | 0.24× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.49 | 0.53 | 53% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 0.86× | 2.62× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 940 | 5.9B CNY (≈$823M) | 32 | 20 | |
| 941 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.3B USD |
| 31 |
| 20 |
| 942 | 470M EUR (≈$517M) | 31 | 56 |
| 943 | 231.7B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 31 | 61 |
| 944 | 302.7B USD | 31 | 63 |
| 945 | 1.21T INR (≈$14.6B) | 31 | 55 |
| 946 | 1.6B USD | 31 | 30 |
| 947 | 1.2B USD | 31 |
| 948 | 35.2B JPY (≈$240M) | 31 | 12 |