Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NETSTREIT Corp.
How NETSTREIT Corp. stacks up
NTST · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #64 of 731 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score77 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including NTST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: 21.9% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 91% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 24.6% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 21.9% | 3.0% | 86% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | Not reported | 11.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 24.6% | 3.8% | 91% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 64 | 530M MYR (≈$117M) | 91 | 81 | |
| 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score