Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NTSK · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,427 of 1,667 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including NTSK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
| Metric | NTSK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -15.1% | 2.3% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | -8.5% | 4.3% | 5% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | -0.8% | 2.7% | 26% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 1.8% | 33.4% | 3% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,427 | 39M USD | 10 | 12 | |
| 1,427 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.7B USD |
| 10 |
| 34 |
| 1,427 | 445M USD | 10 | 17 |
| 1,427 | 593M USD | 10 | 25 |
| 1,427 | 8.9B USD | 10 | 4 |
| 1,427 | 336M USD | 10 | 45 |
| 1,427 | 2.2B USD | 10 | 27 |
| 1,427 | 3.4B USD | 10 | 52 |
| 1,427 | 2.1B USD | 10 | 43 |