Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nutrien Ltd.
How Nutrien Ltd. stacks up
NTR · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #338 of 1,321 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including NTR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.5% vs peer median 8.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 71% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.3% vs peer median 2.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.1% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 7.1% | 3.8% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 12.5% | 8.6% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 6.3% | 2.6% | 71% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 78.1% | 61.0% | 61% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 338 | 847M EUR (≈$932M) | 74 | 56 | |
| 338 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score