Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NetEase, Inc.
How NetEase, Inc. stacks up
NTES · against 17 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #8 of 18 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including NTES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 14.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 18 reported | 7.0% | 5.5% | 53% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 17 reported | 14.0% | 4.1% | 63% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 18 reported | 5.3% | 4.3% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.2B USD | 98 | 39 | |
| 2 | 82.5B USD | 97 | 70 | |
| 3 | 9.39T JPY (≈$63.9B) | 89 | 78 | |
| 4 | 36.3B CHF (≈$41.7B) | 82 | 52 | |
| 4 | 123.4B USD | 82 | 58 | |
| 6 | 73.9B USD | 73 | 58 | |
| 7 | 146.6B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 8 | 74.4B USD | 57 | 75 | |
| 9 | 11.24T JPY (≈$76.4B) | 56 | 46 | |
| 10 | 67.0B SGD (≈$50.9B) | 50 | 56 | |
| 11 | 10.49T JPY (≈$71.3B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 12 | 37.7B USD | 45 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score