Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NetApp, Inc.
How NetApp, Inc. stacks up
NTAP · against 108 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #69 of 109 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including NTAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 23.1% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 109 reported | 12.2% | 16.5% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 94 reported | 23.1% | 32.6% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 108 reported | 6.0% | 8.7% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 4 | 42.6B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 5 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 66 | 72.9B CAD (≈$53.2B) | 62 | 51 | |
| 67 | 20.7B USD | 61 | 58 | |
| 68 | 41.2B USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 69 | 161.4B CNY (≈$22.6B) | 58 | 43 | |
| 69 | 37.5B USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 71 | 6.44T JPY (≈$43.8B) | 56 | 63 | |
| 71 | 4.77T JPY (≈$32.5B) | 56 | 62 | |
| 71 | 24.6B EUR (≈$27.0B) | 56 | 61 | |
| 74 | 35.1B EUR (≈$38.7B) | 52 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score