Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NetApp, Inc.
How NetApp, Inc. stacks up
NTAP · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #172 of 497 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score53 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including NTAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.4% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 3.7% | 1.9% | 71% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 5.8% | 4.0% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 4.4% | 3.3% | 59% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 4.0% | 22.1% | 12% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 166 | 382.5B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 166 | 11.9B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 172 | 283M USD | 61 | 76 | |
| 172 | 6.2B USD | 61 | 66 | |
| 172 | 37.5B USD | 61 | 56 | |
| 172 | 14.8B USD | 61 | 68 | |
| 172 | 6.5B USD | 61 | 48 | |
| 172 | 41.1B USD | 61 | 47 | |
| 178 | 15.0B USD | 60 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score