Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NSLR · against 39 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #16 of 40 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 75
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including NSLR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NSLR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 33 reported | 0.18× | 0.31× | 59% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 36 reported | 1.41 | 0.66 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 39 reported | 6.92× | 3.21× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 2 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 3 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 313M USD | 97 | ||
| 5 | 420M AUD (≈$277M) | 95 | ||
| 12 | 412M MYR (≈$91M) | 83 | 63 | |
| 13 | 1.8B HKD (≈$230M) | 80 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2.4B SEK (≈$242M) | 79 | ||
| 15 | 259M USD | 77 | 71 | |
| 16 | 157M USD | 75 | 79 | |
| 17 | 276M USD | 71 | 40 | |
| 18 | 90M CHF (≈$103M) | 71 | 35 | |
| 19 | 8.4B THB (≈$234M) | 67 | 60 | |
| 20 | 190M USD | 67 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score