Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NRIX · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #501 of 1,373 · scores higher than 64% of peers · safety percentile 64
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including NRIX · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NRIX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.14× | 0.24× | 60% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.82 | 0.53 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 6.34× | 2.62× | 79% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 497 | 2.4B EUR (≈$2.6B) | 64 | 69 | |
| 498 | 4.6B CNY (≈$639M) | 64 | 68 | |
| 499 | 32.6B HKD (≈$4.2B) | 64 | 60 | |
| 500 | 67.60T KRW (≈$48.7B) | 64 | 72 | |
| 501 | 2.7B USD | 64 | 84 | |
| 502 | 474M USD | 63 | 46 | |
| 503 | 862M AUD (≈$569M) | 63 | 54 | |
| 504 | 244.2B KRW (≈$176M) | 63 | 72 | |
| 505 | 73.8B JPY (≈$502M) | 63 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score