Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NRC · against 1,336 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #716 of 1,337 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score134 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including NRC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
| Metric | NRC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,287 reported | 1.0% | 1.5% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,357 reported | 4.3% | 4.2% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 711 reported | 4.1% | -1.0% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,306 reported | 1.2% | 37.9% | 6% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 716 | 12.8B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 44 |
| 716 | 1.6B USD | 46 | 52 |
| 716 | 21.7B EUR (≈$23.9B) | 46 | 47 |
| 716 | 1.26T USD | 46 | 62 |
| 716 | 532M USD | 46 | 34 |
| 716 | 40.2B USD | 46 | 73 |
| 716 | 11.4B USD | 46 | 64 |
| 716 | 49.1B USD | 46 | 69 |
| 730 | 5.4B CNY (≈$755M) | 45 | 54 |