Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Novanta Inc.
How Novanta Inc. stacks up
NOVT · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #315 of 497 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including NOVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.0% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NOVT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NOVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 1.1% | 1.9% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 3.5% | 4.0% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 2.0% | 3.3% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 29.0% | 22.1% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NOVT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 315 | 598.2B USD | 35 | 60 | |
| 315 | 3.5B USD | 35 | 68 | |
| 315 | 40.6B USD | 35 | 54 | |
| 315 | 23.3B USD | 35 | 39 | |
| 315 | 5.6B USD | 35 | 50 | |
| 315 | 2.6B USD | 35 | 47 | |
| 315 | 684M USD | 35 | 21 | |
| 322 | 28.7B USD | 34 | 47 | |
| 322 | 89.2B USD | 34 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score