Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOAH · against 143 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #50 of 144 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 72
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including NOAH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NOAH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 120 reported | 0.01× | 0.54× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 137 reported | 0.81 | 0.62 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 139 reported | 3.60× | 2.22× | 64% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 46 | 501M EUR (≈$551M) | 75 | 58 | |
| 47 | 706M USD | 74 | 52 | |
| 48 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 73 | 55 | |
| 49 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 73 | 59 | |
| 50 | 465M USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 51 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 72 | 59 | |
| 52 | 276M USD | 71 | 40 | |
| 53 | 3.6B HKD (≈$461M) | 70 | 61 | |
| 54 | 1.0B AUD (≈$687M) | 70 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score