Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NNN REIT, Inc.
How NNN REIT, Inc. stacks up
NNN · against 115 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #78 of 116 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including NNN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Real Estate peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -3.7% vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NNN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NNN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 117 reported | 6.5% | 6.5% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 100 reported | -3.7% | 14.5% | 27% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 114 reported | 6.1% | 7.4% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NNN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 74 | 83.6B SEK (≈$8.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 75 | 19.0B SAR (≈$5.1B) | 54 | 61 | |
| 76 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 77 | 7.3B USD | 52 | 23 | |
| 78 | 7.9B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 79 | 682.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 79 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 79 | 14.8B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 82 | 10.8B CAD (≈$7.9B) | 49 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score