Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
How Annaly Capital Management, Inc. stacks up
NLY · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 180 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score22 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including NLY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 242.7% vs peer median 11.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 87.3% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NLY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NLY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 87.3% | 5.9% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 242.7% | 13.9% | 92% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 4.7% | 4.8% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NLY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 4 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 4 | 946M USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 4 | 332M USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 4 | 822M USD | 98 | 42 | |
| 10 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score