Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NIKE, Inc.
How NIKE, Inc. stacks up
NKE · against 44 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
44/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #16 of 45 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including NKE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NKE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NKE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | 5.4% | 3.9% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 8.2% | 5.9% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 31 reported | 3.8% | 3.8% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 26.0% | 17.3% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NKE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 3 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 86 | 72 | |
| 4 | 4.66T JPY (≈$31.7B) | 82 | 61 | |
| 5 | 34.6B EUR (≈$38.1B) | 81 | 42 | |
| 12 | 40.6B USD | 58 | 61 | |
| 13 | 526.8B ZAR (≈$29.0B) | 54 | 59 | |
| 14 | 77.5B USD | 53 | 26 | |
| 15 | 28.4B EUR (≈$31.3B) | 46 | 59 | |
| 16 | 57.2B USD | 44 | 50 | |
| 16 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 44 | 58 | |
| 18 | 34.0B USD | 40 | 52 | |
| 18 | 47.0B USD | 40 | 61 | |
| 20 | 51.5B USD | 39 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score