Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NIKE, Inc.
How NIKE, Inc. stacks up
NKE · against 46 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
30/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #40 of 47 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including NKE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.8% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NKE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NKE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 47 reported | -1.2% | 8.1% | 9% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 42 reported | 6.5% | 6.1% | 54% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 47 reported | -3.8% | 9.4% | 0% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NKE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 3 | 38.3B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 4 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 5 | 4.05T INR (≈$48.6B) | 97 | 53 | |
| 36 | 36.3B USD | 46 | 49 | |
| 37 | 4.66T JPY (≈$31.7B) | 43 | 61 | |
| 37 | 89.1B AUD (≈$58.8B) | 43 | 41 | |
| 39 | 29.9B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 40 | 57.2B USD | 30 | 50 | |
| 41 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.7B) | 27 | 36 | |
| 42 | 78.5B EUR (≈$86.4B) | 26 | 58 | |
| 43 | 34.6B EUR (≈$38.1B) | 25 | 42 | |
| 43 | 49.1B USD | 25 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score